Re: HTML_Form versus QuickForm

From: Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:37:05 +0000
Subject: Re: HTML_Form versus QuickForm
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-6089@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Thank you people! "Eric "E-Dawg" Johnston" <edawg@e-dawg.com> wrote in message news:1055942638.16090.31.camel@gila... > No need to even bother looking for the include path - notice that '.' > there in front of the ':'? That means search the current directory > first for includes. Stick it there, problem solved. > > I've stuck the HTML directory structure in the same directory as a > script that depended on the Integrated Templates on servers that lacked > PEAR... > > Jeroen: Have fun. > > - Eric > > On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 07:14, LIMBOURG Arnaud wrote: > > Hello, > > > > your don't need your webhost to support quickform. > > > > Just put it in your include_path and you're done ;) > > > > Take the following: > > > > your host give you access to > > > > .:/your/path/includes > > > > Install quickform in /your/path/includes and you have access to it. > > > > Arnaud. > > > > > The QuickForm (quickform.php) is (unfortunately) not supported by my > > > webhost. Form.php is, but I can't find a nice example of defining and > > > processing a form with form.php on the internet. Also no > > > example is shipped > > > in the distribution of the package (QuickForm has got 7 examples!) > > > > > > Question > > > > > > is form.php already superseded by quickform? > > > if not does anyone have a nice example? >

« previous php.pear.general (#6089) next »