Re[2]: [PEAR] Some questions about LiveUser
| From: | Christian Schäfer | Date: | Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:55:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re[2]: [PEAR] Some questions about LiveUser | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-general+get-9345@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hi Markus,
> Thing is, if we start supporting entities called "roles" and "classes",
> soon other people will pop up and demand support for more entities,
> called for example "rooftops", "kitchensinks" or "pets"...
> whatever is
> thought as hyperultraessential for an application. But in the end, it
> comes down to be able to assign rights to... well, groups :-)
hmm.. I can not agree on this issue.
roles is not just another name for groups. when you thnink about
windows nt user managment or selinux, you will see what a role is and
what is a group, these are totally different concepts. your
implementation of groups is a concept of roles really, groups are much
less..
but yeah perhaps I coulds live with r_thingy and g_thingy..
gruss
/Christian mailto:caefer@krachstoff.net
--
I propose that the following character sequence for joke markers:
:-)
19-Sep-82 11:44 Scott E Fahlman