Re: Re: PHP_Beautifier-0.0.6.1 (devel) Released.
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:07:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP_Beautifier-0.0.6.1 (devel) Released. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-1358@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
David Costa wrote:
On Jun 4, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:well i dont think we should be overly harsh. this package is still underdevelopment. the developer is new. i think its enough if we inform the developer. at its current development stage i dont see the issue for the users as so drastic. however we should make clear that in the future we will remove releases once we feel that this inconsistency can lead to issues for users relying on this package. we shouldnt use removing releases as a way to beat developers with a stick. we should only remove releases to prevent issues for pear users. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07Hi Lukas Smith! You wrote:I agree, this is a candidate for rollback ;)The new PEAR package PHP_Beautifier-0.0.6.1 (devel) has been released at http://pear.php.net/.Uhhh ... are we taking the detail of versions a bit to far maybe? 0.0.6.1? Well, I was fine with 0.0.6, though I don't know why they didn't start with 0.1.0, but adding another digit is way too much imho. What do you think?yup its not according to the regulations. but i think its enough if we let him know.Mmmmhhh... Very inconsistent... IMHO we should roll it back and let it be released with the correct version number. That's the only way to make people living that regulation.