Re: Re: Auto unit testing
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:47:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Auto unit testing | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-1935@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ups I read this wrong, sorry :-)
Read "PHPUnit is supported" somehow, but anyway I doubt anyone from QA
will learn Ruby if they can do the thing in PHP, at least that's what
I'd do ;)
Regards
Helgi
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 11:37, Helgi Þormar wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 10:54, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > Helgi Þormar wrote:
> > > This is something QA should look into
> >
> > No, one does not want to look into Rephlux. One wants to learn Ruby and
> > add PHP / PHPUnit support to Damage Control [1].
>
> Actually we're not just going to support PHPUnit, hope that's not a
> shock to you, ;) but I can't find the list of Unit Test things it
> supports, could you point me to some link with that ?
>
> Also it's good if the QA actually can modify the auto stuff to their
> needs, without learning Ruby, that's why I picked Rephlux over the Ruby
> solutions (yes I knew about them and looked into them while ago for my
> own projects) :)
>
> > --
> > [1] http://damagecontrol.codehaus.org/
>
> --
> Regards
> Helgi