Re: Package Abstracts
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:20:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package Abstracts | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-1970@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 21:07, Paul M Jones wrote:
> Helgi Þormar wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 20:43, Martin Jansen wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue Nov 16, 2004 at 10:5932PM +0000, Helgi Þormar wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 22:37, Paul M Jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I have volunteered in the past, and will continue to do so on a
> >>>>standing basis, to set up a YaWiki
> >>>><http://yawiki.com> installation for
> >>>>pear.php.net.
> >>>
> >>>We want to integrate this into pearweb thus we can't use yawiki (well
> >>>okey we don't want to use it because of the deps outside of pear,
> >>>specially because of yawp)
> >>
> >>Who said that? I for one would be very delighted to set up Paul's wiki
> >>on e.g. wiki.pear.php.net - this way the wiki does not need to inherit
> >>any code from the website, and at the same time the wiki can use the
> >>existing user table for authentication. (Killing two birds with one
> >>stone.)
> >
> > I'd assume if we were going to integrate it it would be kinda funky to
> > have 2 frameworks, i.e. Yawp and Damblan, integrate I mean not just by
> > placing yaWiki in some folder on the server, but well have it as you
> > like.
>
> Not to nitpick, but Yawp is not a framework (at least I don't think of
> it as such). I call it a "foundation" on which you can base apps of any
> sort; except for some glue-code to automate authentication and
> object-creation, it's really just a bunch of PEAR classes aggregated
> behind a static interface class plus a unform configuration file. I
> attempted to make it solution-agnostic; you can use it to write up MVC
> solutions or standalone monolithic apps.
Hmm yeah I know, misused that word, Damblan isn't either a framework in
a way.
>
> > If we get some features to work with yaWiki (not doubt out that we will
> > be able to do so) then I'm fine with having it.
> > (features I mean by little things as #342 turn into a bug link and etc,
> > maybe even a roadmap "module" if I find the time to write such for
> > pearweb.)
>
> The Bug link thing is even easier thank you think. One example is to
> treat the word "Bug" as an interwiki keyword. In the Yawp.conf.php
> file, you would add:
>
> [yawiki]
> interwiki_site = Bug, http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=%s
>
> Then Text_Wiki will automatically translate the text "Bug:2228" as a
> link to http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=2228 -- no
> programming
> involved, just a change to the config file. :-)
I see, never was sure what those interwiki things were anyway :)
but can it do like something similar to this, #4353, and not changing
#foo into a link, i.e. kinda yes just allowing numbers through that
config ?
- Helgi