Re: Bug Summary/Reminder Timeframe - Last Call!
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Sun, 12 Dec 2004 02:20:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bug Summary/Reminder Timeframe - Last Call! | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2176@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 01:36, Klaus Guenther wrote:
> Helgi Þormar <helgi@trance.is> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Seems that we'll begin with sending this out every month (every 4x
> > weeks) weather it's in the beginning, middle or end of the month doesn't
> > really matter (if it matters then speak up).
>
> I don't know if there's a difference in server load at any particular time of
> month. However, if there is, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to peg it to
> that time. Else, I'd suggest not sending this at the very beginning of the
> month, as that's when people get all their notifications for everything, or
> in the last half of the month, as it is not unlikely that people will be
> working to finish up their projects by the end of the month and so will
> simply ignore the bug email. My suggestion would be to send it out at the
> beginning of the second week of every month. Or maybe the end of the first
> week. :)
>
> If I'm not making any sense, please ignore me. ;)
Yebb that makes sense, was thinking along the same line, maybe even get
the first email out by Christmas ;)
The first run of those emails won't probably be on it's final schedule
since I want to get this stuff once out before the end of the year.
Sundays always have some load, peardoc generation, but I'll move this
very soon over to pear-webmaster to make the final decision based on
other cronjobs and such.
> > If anyone says anything else then every 4x weeks (only I and Lukas have
> > come up with other timeframes) then speak up now or for ever hold your
> > silence.
>
> Sounds good to me!
- Helgi