Re: RFC header comment block

Salut Arnaud, Daniel & QA-folks

Daniel, Do you plan to call votes on the RFC ? It looks reasonable, if it is accepted the pear manual can be modified accordingly after.

Then include what comes out of this version numbering metadata proposal that was accepted last time. Please, could it be possible to update also CS a little ? It gave a lot of discussions as: (when some interest I can review available archives to complete) - ternary operator, - what should be the name for public properties and classes - file naming conventions - is it to use 'string' or "string" ? - ... Yes, I come up with one more point: I try to code the strings as 'string' when they should remain fixed and as "string\n" when some \n or variable are to be interpreted in it. But then, when a variable comes in, I try as PHP recommands to bracket it: "string with {$variable}" and not "string with $variable" That eases the reading and future updates (e.g. when $variable becomes an array or an object) Ok, it's not saving fingers ;)

http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=128 Arnaud. Tu me dis, Arnaud, si il faut traduire ! :)

à+ -- bertrand Gugger