Re: Stable may require unstable ?
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:34:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Stable may require unstable ? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2405@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
bertrand Gugger wrote:
Hi, May a PEAR package become 'Stable' even if it requires 'alpha', 'beta' sub PEAR packages ? ThanksThe current rule is that if you want to make a release, required dependencies must have at least the same state. So for example, if I make a beta release, it can't depend on an alpha package. But it can have an optional dependency on an alpha package. However, we haven't really been trying to actively enforce this for releases below stable. It would be good, of course, to put the rule somewhere :) Klaus