Re: Pearweb package validator
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:45:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Pearweb package validator | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2409@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:49:58 +0100
l.alberton@quipo.it (Lorenzo Alberton) wrote:
> Greg Beaver wrote:
> >>> Is there a good reason it can't be version 1.0.0? If it is
> >stable, >> why wait?
> >>
> >> I think the package itself is stable, but the API
> >> may still change. Anyway, Wolfram Kriesing (being
> >> the original developer) has the last word on it,
> >> I'm just keeping his package in shape until he comes back.
> >
> > If the API is going to change, I would recommend going with
> > unstable, beta should be fine. Ultimately it won't hurt users
> > to know that they API can change underneath their code.
>
> I don't know if Wolfram wants to change the API
> (personally, I don't), I'll ask him in a week or so
> when he's back. In the meanwhile I'll hold off the
> release.
Who maintains these package(s) now? I talked with him today, if
there is an active maintainer and this maintainer considers a
package as stable, he's free to release it as stable without asking
Wolfram.
Regards,
--Pierre