Re: XML_Tree - Lets Fix this up finally
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:31:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: XML_Tree - Lets Fix this up finally | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2462@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:07:55 +0100
lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) wrote:
> Justin Patrin wrote:
>
> > I don't see that. It has some implied stuff in it, though. The
> > My_Package example says to use 1.0.0 but the My_Package2 one
> > says 2.0.0. This implies that major revisions over 1 must have
> > their first stable release at the # of the package. If you think
> > this isn't clear or isn't what the RFC says perhaps we should
> > draft another one to clarify this.
>
> Not interested. I was quite happy with the original RFC ..
> The only thing I in the end agreed should have been changed was
> removing package state to the version name.
Same here. I do not see the point here. The name of one package is
Foo, its version 1.2.3, another Foo2, its version 2.0.0, Foo2 being
a better/faster version of Foo. If that can help you to just apply
the current rules and move on, see it as a completely new package.
And if you are still not convince, we cannot technically change this
rule.
--Pierre