Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] HTML_Safe-1.3.5 (beta) Released.
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:51:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] HTML_Safe-1.3.5 (beta) Released. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2982@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 9/3/2005 8:56 PM, Klaus Guenther spake the following words:
> On 9/3/2005 8:27 PM, Justin Patrin spake the following words:
>
>>On 3 Sep 2005 17:42:45 -0000, PEAR Announce <pear-dev@lists.php.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The new PEAR package HTML_Safe-1.3.5 (beta) has been released at
>>>http://pear.php.net/.
>>>
>>
>>Would someome please pull this release? "First Release", "beta", and
>>1.0 is not ok.
>
> The release has been pulled.
>
> Evgeny and Roman, please read the versioning details at
> http://pear.php.net/group/
>
> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
> Rest, unfortunately, isn't updated. It's a bug.
I pulled 1.0.0RC1. Regardless of the state of the external project, PEAR
requires a 0.x.x release *before* a 1.0.0 release. That allows for
issues to be ironed out. Please also make your first release an alpha
release and fix the license problem in package.xml. It looks really bad
in pearweb (the license line is truncated). Please find a solution that
will display properly in pearweb before your next release (you can
experiment using the "edit" tab on the package homepage).
Maybe we need to make this clearer to the user. We really, really need
to emphasize to new maintainers that they need to first make a 0.x.x
release first. The first release should also be an alpha release, not a
beta, regardless of stability. We currently have *very* stable
(reliable) package in PEAR that are still released as alpha due to
possible API changes. If all goes well, and tests run fine, then it
shouldn't be a problem to advance quite quickly to stable.
Best,
Klaus