Re: HTML_PAGE2

Ian wrote:

guenthek@aim.com wrote: Hi Ian, I'm still here :) I've not been very active and haven't had a chance

to look at the patches. Since it's a feature request and not a bug report, I didn't take it that seriously. But I'll see what I can do about getting to it. It's complicated by the matter that you sent it

as a file, not a diff. Not that I hold that against you or anything,

of course. Just forces me to take an extra step. Klaus, Arnaud has made me lead on this package now and made you inactive,

OK, then I guess I'll just come back to active status. As Arnaud mentioned, I've been overly busy lately and a second lead would be cool. (Arnaud, I just wish you would have tried to get in touch with me first! Would have been considerate, at least...)

I have just been working through it all and getting it up to speed. I have already added my patch and fixed a couple of other bugs, but I don't have CVS Karma yet; I was hoping to get this soon so I could update.

Sounds good! My only concern before rolling a stable release is the documentation. I tried to keep the API very well documented, so this might be a very good starting point. As I have CVS karma, I'd be happy to commit the changes. cvs diff -u gives you pretty nice output for the whole directory. If you want to shoot that over, I'd be happy to take a look at it! I was going to update the doctype for XHTML 2.0 pretty soon. Part of the reason I haven't done that is that I feel the doctype code needs to be overhauled, as the new versions of XHTML allow for extra schema, etc., as per the following page: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/conformance.html#s_conform But let's continue this discussion offlist :) Klaus ________________________________________________________________________ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.