Re: Re: Taking over Image_Transform

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:53:09 -0700, Stoyan Stefanov wrote: > Interestingly enough, just today I was thinking the same thing. :) > >> My personal idea is to have Image_Text use Image_Canvas as base, since >> this one also allows writing text and provides multiple drivers. >> Image_Text would be for things like colored text, shadows and whatnot, >> while Image_Canvas provides the basic methods and abstraction. I'd love seeing that :-) Then I could remove addText from Image_Transform and PEAR would only be maintaining the solution in one place, this is one of the cases where IMHO we should try to merge work and no duplication (if possible) instead of having such similar things :-) I might also have a peak at Image_Canvas and see how I can "abuse" it for Image_Transform -- There are no stupid questions, only stupid people