question to End-Users of PHP_CompatInfo

From: Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:15:58 +0000
Subject: question to End-Users of PHP_CompatInfo
Groups: php.pear.general php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-5040@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I Do not like to cross post in multiple mailing list. But perharps End-users read only this one, and PEAR QA team this other one Here are the original mail post on PEAR dev mailing list --> For those who have already have a look on new API 1.9.0, you've certainly find a basic very little Extension Support List. Paradoxically I don't wanted to have a break on backward compatibility with previous versions (1.8.1 or less), but you need PHP 5 to build your own Extension Support List (with pciconf CLI script). BTW, that is why I've asked my question about package xml v2 ;-) This case may be perharps consider as a problem by the PEAR QA team ! I don't know their opinion. So my question is to embedded in default package almost all main extension that 90% of end-users used. This will limit disappointment of pure PHP 4 users ! What do you consider as to be a mandatory extension ?

« previous php.pear.qa (#5040) next »