Re: question to End-Users of PHP_CompatInfo

Am Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:15:58 +0100 schrieb Laurent Laville <pear@laurent-laville.org>: > I Do not like to cross post in multiple mailing list. But perharps > End-users read only this one, and PEAR QA team this other one > > Here are the original mail post on PEAR dev mailing list > > --> > > For those who have already have a look on new API 1.9.0, you've > certainly find a basic very little Extension Support List. > > Paradoxically I don't wanted to have a break on backward > compatibility with previous versions (1.8.1 or less), but you need > PHP 5 to build your own Extension Support List (with pciconf CLI > script). > > BTW, that is why I've asked my question about package xml v2 ;-) > > This case may be perharps consider as a problem by the PEAR QA team ! > I don't know their opinion. > > So my question is to embedded in default package almost all main > extension that 90% of end-users used. > > This will limit disappointment of pure PHP 4 users ! > > What do you consider as to be a mandatory extension ? The ones in a normal php installation (activated by default). -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc