Re: Re: !!! Net_SMTP v1.2.4 is broken - please remove urgently !!!
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:33:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: !!! Net_SMTP v1.2.4 is broken - please remove urgently !!! | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-924@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stefan Neufeind wrote:
On 12 Mar 2004 at 17:02, Lukas Smith wrote: [...]some will be higher quality than others. obviously us not spending time with the packages will not mean that those developers are not bound by the PEAR standards. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07well my perception is that everybody wants quality to magically appear, however they are unwilling to accept the consequences, thats why I am suggesting to concentrate on the packages where the maintainer is willing to accept the concequences and not waste our time with the others.We need to keep PEAR in mind as a whole. And therefor we can't have "good" packages and some that don't react to quality-improvements at all. PEAR has always been promoted as a high-quality repository. What will become if we leave all devs the possibility to choose between a high-quality-PEAR and a care-less-PEAR? Is the care-less-branch of PEAR then becoming to be phpcla**es.org? :-))