Re: [pear-webmaster] PEPR

"Tobias Schlitt" <tobias@schlitt.info> wrote in message news:40A111D1.8060606@schlitt.info... > Aidan Lister wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > Hi! > > >There's a couple of features I'd like to see in PEPR > >- Text_Wiki instead of BBcode (BBcode doesn't seem to work, it's not parsed) > > > > > I'll implement that next, when I have time. Needs some change to the > database, so you can select to use BBCode (default because of BC) or > Text_Wiki. Maybe 1-2 weeks. If you like you can provide me a patch. > I can probably do that! *checks timetable* > >- Ability to change proposal while in C-F-V, or atleast add comments and > >reply to the conditional votes > > > > > This is not in sense of the workflow. When going to C4V all issues > should be solved. They should, but often (well, not often) interest picks up only once CFV has been called. > Reply toconditional votes is not feasible. If you have > conditional votes you need to get a +5, you will have to implement them. If the changes are implemented, there's no (built in way) of contacting the author to let them know you've made the changes (sitting on 3 conditional votes that have all been rectified for PHP_Compat, the same was the case with Net_GSQ - conditional votes never changed though problem rectified) > Commenting is only done during proposal phase. But why! > > >- Emails not sent to proposers twice! > > > > > They arn't. They are just send to the proposer and to pear-dev, since > it's not necessary to be subscribed to pear-dev to propose a package. No > sense in changing this. Sorry, I should have been more specific - commenting on your own proposal will result in two emails sent, both to yourself. > > Regards, > Toby Thanks Toby