Re: [pear-webmaster] I should maybe point out here..

On Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 06:5539PM +0100, Steph wrote: > The way I have things set up at present, if you click on a package link and > that package doesn't have an owner in the database, the package will > magically cease to exist. So yes, it _does_ affect our end too; I based my > design around the initial discussions we had, not things that are coming > along as I complete it (or try to), and it already sounds as if I'm going to > have to rewrite a fairly chunk of it due to the table business. Thankfully > it's not the logic that needs rewriting in that case, just stuff like the > number of array elements going into the db and being pulled out. Missing > developers will mean that part of the logic at our end has to be rewritten > too. It means I have to allow for the possibility of 'anon' - i.e. the > information would still need to be in our db, but there'd need to be a bool > 'public' or 'private', which I'd need to access all over the shop. Is > it > actually worth it? given that if you click on anon's packages you'll be > faced with anon's name on the package page at pear.php.net? Ok, ok, you've convinced me. Let's drop this "feature". -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/