Re: cvs: pearweb /cron bug-summary.php
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:20:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: pearweb /cron bug-summary.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-webmaster+get-3437@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 17:34, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Wed Nov 17, 2004 at 02:0336PM -0000, Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson wrote:
> > require_once dirname(__FILE__) . '/../include/pear-config.php';
> > require_once dirname(__FILE__) . '/../public_html/bugs/include/functions.inc';
>
> Is there any reason why $root/public_html/bugs/include isn't
> $root/include/bugs?
No daniel changed it to the old way, and I had no objection, and no one
else it seems at the time :)
> > b.package_name IN ('". implode("', '",
> > $pseudo_pkgs) . "'))
>
> The website is following the PEAR coding standards, thus you should
> separate the concatenation operators with spaces.
Well it isn't much followed IMHO the CS in PEARWeb (which has been
changing though, which is good), but sure it was my mistake :) will fix
> > mail('pear-qa@lists.php.net', $siteBig.' Bug Summary Report',
> > $body, 'From: pear-dev@lists.php.net');
>
> I believe we should use "From: pear-qa@lists.php.net" instead. And
> please pass '-f pear-sys@php.net' as the fifth parameter for mail().
Yes I wasn't sure with the -f, forgot to ask this, but this is a very
much appreciated feedback :)
Regarding the pear-dev vs. pear-qa, I was just keeping this in sync with
the rest of the bug system, and there we use pear-dev, maybe we should
change everything to pear-qa in the bug system ?
Also do you mean the per package email should be from pear-qa, or just
the bug summary ?
Anyway committed the changes
Regards
Helgi