Re: [pear-webmaster] Upgrade JPGraph ?

On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 01:06, Helgi Þormar wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 23:26, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > > Hi Helgi Þormar! > > On 12/15/2004 09:12 AM you wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > A thought here, shouldn't we upgrade JPGraph ? It has had quite many > > > releases since it was committed... > > > > > > I suspect that upgrading it won't be any pain at all, since I can't see > > > any modification (expect config option) that were changed, unless > > > Richard did some modifications before committing, does anyone know if > > > that was the case ? > > > > > > Anyway do you guys think we should upgrade ? I'm +1 on that > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea. Please tag it before so we can easily revert, > > if it does harm anyway.... > > Well I hoped someone which has experience in it would do this ... :-) > > Since it kinda never has worked on my local servers (dunno if I have to > configure my env any extra to make it work ? GD is on afaik) > > But hell I might have a look at it when I've gotten few PEAR packages > out of the door. Ohh yeah also, do we have GD1 or v2 ? and if it's GDv1, then why ? (just curious) - Helgi