Re: Re[2]: [pear-webmaster] I think your xmlrpc methods are psychic.
| From: | Steph | Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:47:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [pear-webmaster] I think your xmlrpc methods are psychic. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-webmaster+get-3709@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hey, Anatoly -
No way. The moment it's formalized, we lose contributors. Speak to Rasmus
about that thought if you don't like my addy.
- Steph
----- Original Message -----
From: "anatoly techtonik" <techtonik@php.net>
To: "Greg Beaver" <greg@chiaraquartet.net>
Cc: "Martin Jansen" <mj@php.net>; "Steph" <steph@zend.com>;
"PEAR
Webmasters" <pear-webmaster@lists.php.net>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 3:33 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [pear-webmaster] I think your xmlrpc methods are psychic.
> Hello Greg,
>
> From Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 11:37:54 PM, you wrote:
>
> GB> Implementing who's-who would be really, really easy. However, I
wonder
> GB> if there is a secure cert for pear.php.net? This would be a good use
> GB> for donated funds, so that https://pear.php.net can be
> GB> used with HTTP
> GB> auth to do secure stuff. This will even allow remote upload of
> GB> releases, and remote validation, and so on.
>
> I would like to see certificates for php.net, since working with
> bugreports via HTTP using CVS password is totally psychic. Also it
> would be nice to have public key authentication to CVS like on SF.
>
>
> t
> --
>