Bug #7947 [Csd->Opn]: Bugtracker asks for password that doesn't exist

Edit report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=7947&edit=1 ID: 7947 Updated by: wiesemann@php.net Reported By: wiesemann at php dot net -Status: Closed +Status: Open Type: Bug Package: Bug System Operating System: Irrelevant PHP Version: Irrelevant Assigned To: pajoye New Comment: > apparently this is fixed No, it is not. Mark it as "Won't fix" (because of the huge changes that would be needed) if you want, but "Closed" is definitely wrong here, as there was only a discussion, but no code change. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2006-12-22 23:09:29] cellog at php dot net apparently this is fixed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2006-06-20 13:44:51] wiesemann at php dot net > The question is if it is a good thing to put the developer > link in the user (which is the only) mail, or make > it a private mail. There are two cases: (1) If the reports is answered: ATTENTION! Do NOT reply to this email! To reply, use the web interface found at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=7947&edit=2 (2) The email after I wrote the report: Edit bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=7947&edit=2 If we have the possibility to differ between the cases whether a developer reported the bug or somebody else, we should modify the links accordingly. That would make life a little bit easier. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2006-06-20 13:34:45] pajoye at php dot net > Using different links in these two cases should be > sufficient, no need to definie separate email templates. The question is if it is a good thing to put the developer link in the user (which is the only) mail, or make it a private mail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2006-06-20 13:32:08] wiesemann at php dot net > Yes, because you are normally not supposed to use the > second edit mode, it is only for users. Okay, but for additional comments from myself (or the reply to your question, which is in a different email "template" in the script), the link is "wrong". Using different links in these two cases should be sufficient, no need to definie separate email templates. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2006-06-20 13:25:11] pajoye at php dot net Yes, because you are normally not supposed to use the second edit mode, it is only for users. Not sure if it is a good thing to add the developer link to the mail and/or to send a separate mail to the developers. Any comment? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=7947 -- Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=7947&edit=1