Re: Re[2]: [PHP-PEAR] something I noticed re:licenses.

> I do think that binarycloud is great, but ... having dozens of mails > "go download binarycloud" is not the thing I intended to see I think you need to put that a little more in context. that was, let me see, _one_ mail. many of my other mails of course mention binarycloud, it being the reason I subscribe to this list and all? > here. I understand that a good package needs a descent publicity, but > I suppose this list is a wrong place for this. I am not attempting to publicize binarycloud on this list, it needs no extra publicity. That would also be in extremely bad taste. I am here specifically to interact with the PEAR community to try and ensure that a couple things I'd like to see happen, do (i.e. to observe, if I see soemthing that I want clarified, etc I go at it), and to get a very good feel for where PEAR is going and how the code is changing. binarycloud's user base is growing (even without public cvs and a little0bitty website) and I expect binarycloud will use a number of PEAR resources. as such it's prudent for me to keep track of the pear community and its activities. If you bother to read any of my messages, you will find that they are 90% in response to other threads, and they speak directly to the topic presented in that thread. Last week, a lot happened - and there was a lot to say. Today, there probably isn't. That thread is gone, and I'm just here reading stig's db post (which looks great to me) that's it, I suggest you go buy some pepto-bismol. _alex -- Alex Black, Head Monkey enigma@turingstudio.com The Turing Studio, Inc. http://www.turingstudio.com vox+510.666.0074 fax+510.666.0093 Saul Zaentz Film Center 2600 Tenth St Suite 433 Berkeley, CA 94710-2522