Re: numRows() for oci8

Quoting Alex Black <enigma@turingstudio.com>: > was the decision "lowest common denominator" or just "we're going to > support > whatever the current db supports, the rest is your problem :)" I see is as "reasonable common denominator". We'll throw DB_NOT_SUPPORTED errors for some things, but providing numrows() would just encourage its use, which would either require emulation or remove a lot of the point of a common db layer. Of course, Stig's idea to have multiple levels of drivers, etc., could make all of this irrelevant. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> Entropy. It's what's for dinner.