Re: RCS tags
| From: | Colin Viebrock | Date: | Fri, 09 Feb 2001 02:55:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RCS tags | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-1315@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
[Fri, 9 Feb 2001] Anil Madhavapeddy said:
> Why not just do:
>
> // $Revision$
>
> Seriously - you shouldn't be actually comparing RCS ids from a program; my
> suggestion was purely for a simple visibility test. I think the only
> version function that a PEAR package should be obliged to have is an
> author-defined version, which can encompass a set of changes, and the RCS
> tag should just stick around in the comments where it can be seen easily.
This may be counter to what I said earlier, but I think I agree with
Anil's argument. :)
Comparing RCS IDs is probably more difficult and not as useful as
comparing author-defined versions. Just as long as authors update their
version numbers when they make significant changes.
- Colin