Re: variable method names

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > Quoting Kendrick Vargas <ken@hudat.com>: > > > I've needed something like this since 4.0RC1 has been out, and there > > hasn't been anything stable in the way of an implementation that can do > > what I need to do. eval() used to work (kinda), but it no longer returns > > the return value from the called function, so it's also useless. At the > > time 4.0RC1 came about, there was no call_user_method(). > > Maybe I missed something, but what's wrong with $this->$method()? when I tried it originally (some pre-release version of 4.0) it didn't work. As for the syntax, I'm not a school-educated programmer, so I'm not sure what would be correct :-) -peace --- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK ----------+---------- GAT d- s:+ !a C++$ UL/S/I/B++++$ P+ | "In the ongoing battle between objects L++ E- W+(+++) N K- w(---) O-- M@ | made of aluminum going hundreds of V(--) PS+++ PE Y+ PGP@ t++ 5 X+ R- | miles per hour and the ground going tv+ b- DI++++ D+(+++) G e>++ h--- | zero, the ground has yet to lose." r++ z+>+++ - END GEEK CODE BLOCK ---+