Re: Documentation Generation

Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > > Quoting Ulf Wendel <ulf.wendel@redsys.de>: > > > Hmmm - as a programm name it's not perfect, but as a CVS name - maybe. > > Might get mixed with the generated HTML docs. I'll name it phpdoc on the > > german php conference and this will be my internal working title. I'll > > accept nearly every official cvs name. > > It's your call - it's your code. :) I'm just tossing out suggestions. I > think it would probably be good for the name of the cvs tree to be > consistent... > > Looking at the php cvs repository, there's already phpdoc, but there is no > pear repository. What would people think of creating a top-level pear/ > module, in which we'd put standard tools like phpdoc? (so phpdoc would go in > a phpdoc/ directory in the pear/ module, and consistency is maintained) However it gets named, of course I would like to see it somewhere on php.net. I could live with the name "PEARDoc". Anyway, I have to release it now: http://www.phpdoc.de/ . The german php congress starts tomorrow. Feel free to check it to the php CVS und the php licence. I'll be back on monday after the congress and after the birthday of my girlfriend which had a terrible lover the last weeks. Documentation follows on monday. Ulf