coding standard, phpDoc
| From: | Alex Black | Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2000 01:02:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | coding standard, phpDoc | ||
| Groups: | php.pear | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-pear+get-423@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hi all,
I'm finalizing the binarycloud code spec, including comment/documentation
standards, and of all the autodocers out there I've seen, PHPDoc seems to be
the best. it uses the _exact_ same syntax as javadoc for its comment
standard, and I'm inclined to include that inn binarycloud as part of the
spec.
Is there a reason I shouldn't do this? binarycloud could add a huge amount
of solid, production tested code to pear, and I'm trying to make sure the
first release is as clean as possible :)
-alex
--
Alex Black, Head Monkey
enigma@turingstudio.com
The Turing Studio, Inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com
vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093
Saul Zaentz Film Center
2600 Tenth St Suite 433
Berkeley, CA 94710-2522