Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear Makefile.in/pear/CacheFunction_Cache.php

From: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:12:59 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4 /pear Makefile.in/pear/CacheFunction_Cache.php
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear 
Request: Send a blank email to php-pear+get-639@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Quoting Sebastian Bergmann <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de>: > True, but there are things like the cache_*() functions that should be > functions, and not classes. All I'm asking is that you justify that statement. Static classes are possible in php, and are currently the only way we have of curtailing namespace impact right now. There's been a lot of discussion recently on making php work better for enterprise needs; one of the things that would help this is to have the infrastructure that we use - things like PEAR classes - be very clean in their use of the global namespace. -chuck -- Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org> "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the chicken!" - Baby Blues

« previous php.pear (#639) next »