RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt

On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ed Batutis wrote: > > > I use "you" for all intl developers :) We sent many many mails (this > > list and internals) about the poor naming of these new functions and > > got zero reply so far. > > Personally I think the naming is OK - maybe not perfect, but what is > perfect? Anyway, there was a long discussion about this on the php-icu list. > I think that's where you might want to post your thoughts. It doesn't have to be perfect, but there is a reason why we have some form of naming convention. The most important thing is that we want function names to be descriptive - grapheme_extract vs grapheme_extractb vs grapheme_extractc is hardly that. In this case they're not even following the ICU names AFAICS. Allthough I've been following the php-icu list as well, I still find it strange that all most of the other (non php-icu) devs see is that you want to push to get this into the core. If that's the case, you should work with us - and not just ignore and trying to do it *only* your way. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org