Re: Re: com web/pecl: Strongly recommend including a licesnse, but not require it: public_html/release-upload.php
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:38:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: com web/pecl: Strongly recommend including a licesnse, but not require it: public_html/release-upload.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pecl.cvs php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-cvs+get-19945@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >
> >> +1, and considering how little discussion was taking place before
> >> making the license file mandatory.
> >>
> >> On Oct 13 the license issue was brought up when discussing the new
> >> windows build integration for pecl(which I guess would be easy to
> >> miss if you aren't really interested or care about the windows
> >> builds), then the change was implemented the next day.
> >
> > Sounds like a pretty unilateral decision too... and something I've
> > not noticed on the lists - and I read most of it.
> >
> >> Would it be ok if this grace period is kept for the end of this
> >> year, then turning this back into an error?
> >
> > Actually, I don't think we should force people to use a licencing
> > file at all. As a warning, absolutely, but just requiring this to
> > make a release is silly. It would break a lot of extensions in
> > pecl/*/trunk right now *after* the packages are made,
>
> git add LICENSE
> add LICENSE to package.xml
> git commit -m"add LICENSE" package.xml
> git push origin
> pecl package package.xml
>
> five minutes chrono. kthby.
It is irrelevant how much time it takes. *You* have just made almost
everybody's life harder for a marginal benefit. And this only gets
noticed upon uploading, not on packaging, which is where it should check
for this instead of taking a short cut throwing things out after it's
already been compiled, packaged and uploaded.
> > and that's not even thinking about the pecl extensions not in PECL.
>
> Why should we care about extensions not in PECL?
Of course, those extensions are also part of the ecosystem.
cheers,
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
Posted with an email client that doesn't mangle email: alpine