Re: serialize_binary => pecl

Antony Dovgal wrote:

Maybe bserialize would be better? Imo serialize_binary is too long and too hard to type/remember.

The "serialize_binary" was my suggestion for the package name and for the internal prefixes of the C functions. This way we can have a group of serialze extensions (moving ext/wddx to pecl/serialize_wddx comes to mind) The userlevel functions could still be serialize_binary() and serialize_unbinary() IMHO. Or maybe we could even come up with a more general serialization interface that only has string serialize(mixed value [, string handler]) and mixed unserialize(string str, [, string handler]) -- Hartmut Holzgraefe <hartmut@php.net>