Re: Question

Hi Johannes, On 25 March 2013 07:57, Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 20:59 -0300, Cesar D. Rodas wrote: >> >> > I think there is a term "resource" which is misunderstood, as what >> you >> > mean by that is the Resource class. PHP resource type is something >> else. >> >> I register a new resource type, anyway is not a bad idea to wrap >> resources inside classes/objects. > > Using resources is bad. > They are inefficient legacy from older versions. Internal classes are in > many ways better. Thanks for the advice, I'll change resources to classes somehow. > That aside: Both aren't really meant to be used on a per-request basis > and I don't think anybody really has done that. > > I think you should provide an relatively generic resource class. > > johannes > > > > -- Cesar D. Rodas Open source developer http://cesarrodas.com/ Phone: +595-983-161-124