Re: Re: binaries release
| From: | Remi Collet | Date: | Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:51:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: binaries release | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-10999@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 30/08/2013 10:18, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>> Pierre Joye in php.pecl.dev (Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:38:20 +0200):
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>>>> I only do that if the release is already published at
>>>> http://www.php.net/downloads.php but the
>>>> announcement is delayed.
>>>>
>>>> The tagging of a release is only a sign for me that a release is
>>>> imminent.
>>>
>>> The announcement makes it official, not the upload or the tagging :)
>>
>> Which is a bit odd. The announcement of 5.4.19 was about two days after
>> it appeared on http://windows.php.net/download/
>>
>> "... I really do not think it is a good thing to publish a build for a
>> given non existent release.", dixit Pierre.
>>
>> Are some pigs more equal than others? ;-)
>
> No, should have been done or updated at the same time. Will check that out.
>
I also noticed that Windows are often available some time before the
announcement.
For RPM, I'm used to
- download tarball from RM download
- build them (very long)
- wait for announcement
- check md5sum of the "official" sources
- publish the update.
Remi.