Re: ZEND_* or PHP_* macros

Clear, Thanks "John Coggeshall" <john@coggeshall.org> wrote in message news:1093733865.20319.1.camel@coogle.localdomain... > Honestly? I don't think it matters at all for the most part. As you > already noted, the PHP_ macros now are largely direct aliases to ZEND_ > counterparts. However, I don't think this is a completely hard-and-fast > rule either. > > In general, I've always looked at it as "PHP extensions" such as tidy, > curl, etc. should use the PHP macros while "Zend Engine Extensions" such > as an optimizer, debugger, etc. should be strictly ZEND_ macros. > > Regards, > > John > > On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 14:50, Catalin Trifu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to develop a PHP extension for libwbxml library >> and i've been trying to get some info about best practices when >> coding such stuff. >> I am a little puzzled however by the usage of PHP_ macros or >> ZEND_ macros: >> The PHP manual says it's better to use the zend maros: >> ZEND_FUNCTION, ZEND_FE, etc. >> but on pecl.pear.net in coding standards it is said that >> PHP_* macros are preffered >> As I saw, most PHP_* macros are ZEND_* aliases >> So, which is wich and why two different guides ? >> >> Thanks, >> Catalin > -- > -=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=- > John Coggeshall http://www.coggeshall.org/ > The PHP Developer's Handbook > http://www.php-handbook.com/ > -=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=--=~=-