Re: Stomp

Hi Gennady, Just a curiosity, Which stomp server implementation are you using? ActiveMQ, Rabbit or something else? Lorenzo 2014-11-25 17:25 GMT+01:00 Gennady Feldman <gena01@gmail.com>: > So I am trying to see if the implementation can be updated from Stomp 1.0 > spec (which is somewhat weird in places) to something newer. > > A couple of notes on bugs: > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64670 - Reading message body is > broken, > when content-length is declared - has a patch attached! > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64671 - NACKs are exactly like > ACKs - has > a patch attached! > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67170 - Disable Nagle's > Algorithm with > TCP_NODELAY, it delays sending small messages - has a patch attached! > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63935 - Build fails when > enabling openssl > - sounds like a configure issue on x64 (there's workaround in the comments) > > This is the issue I just filed: > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=68497 - > Stomp client doesn't parse ERROR response on CONNECT > > Thank you, > > Gennady > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Lorenzo Fontana <fontanalorenz@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi! I'm trying to get involved :) >> >> If you can share some information about these bugs I'll be glad to help >> maintaining this extension :) >> >> Lorenzo >> On Nov 25, 2014 12:46 AM, "Johannes Schlüter" <johannes@schlueters..de> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 17:45 -0500, Gennady Feldman wrote: >>> > I've been using Stomp module ( >>> > http://pecl.php.net/package/stomp ) and >>> > noticed that it hasn't been updated in something like ~2 years. The >>> source >>> > tree looks quiet as well (no new commits since Sun, 17 Mar 2013). I've >>> > tried to contact the only dev via twitter and e-mail with no response.. >>> > >>> > I've been pointed to this mailing list for possible suggestions on how >>> to >>> > proceed. I'd love to see it updated again. There's also a number of >>> bugs >>> > that could be fixed as well. >>> >>> Are you volunteering to fix the bugs or are you looking for a new >>> maintainer? If the first we certainly can help you get started. Looking >>> for a new maintainer is tough - many people are quite busy. if you >>> however can break down bugs by importance and maybe estimate which might >>> be simpler and which might be tougher we probably can motivate somebody >>> who is trying to get involved, while I won't make any promises :-) >>> >>> johannes >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>> >>> >