Re: Hi everybody

From: Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:53:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Hi everybody
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-12794@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Well i'm not sure translit extension and mine serve the main purpose. With unidecode, you don't have to know which dialect you get in input, it simply and quickly convert each non-roman character to its equivalent. When i try to do the same thing with translit, i can't achieve the same result. I might not using it well, here is a sample test: https://gist.github.com/vianneyb/f3c2e6d99006859a607b Vianney. 2015-04-10 15:58 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schlüter <johannes@schlueters.de>: > On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 15:23 +0200, Vianney Briois wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > > > So, i check the transliterator class via the ICU pecl package. It > > works well on almost every tests i ran. > > It's quite powerful, but it is slower and does not exactly fulfill my > > needs. > > I did check the pecl translit extension before doing mine, and it does > > not work with the full range of characters i need. (And if you don't > > provide all parameters, you can have a segfault...) > > Are those issues in translit fixable? Or is your version a better > replacement? - I prefer one well maintained extension over too much > confusion for users about which to pick :) > > If you say they are different enough that's fine and no blocker from me. > > > Finally, according to your comments, i removed useless declarations, > > complied to C88/C90, enhanced the error reporting, and added licence > > header. > > Haven't checked this, yet, but great! > > > thx for your time! > > Thank you for contributing to PHP! > > johannes > > > -- BRIOIS Vianney

« previous php.pecl.dev (#12794) next »