Re: A native Windows binding for PHP - released
| From: | Justin Hannus | Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:50:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: A native Windows binding for PHP - released | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-1345@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Though I haven't had a chance to check out the code, it sounds very
promising to me.
> Your ideas, comments, criticisms and suggestions are very welcome.
One thought though.... probably allot more work -- With having 2 separate
interfaces for windowing, PHP-GTK and WinBinder, creating a single api would
be nice. Like xslt and the PDO extension (using different backend libs under
same php API) or like java's awt or swing. And when a user went to compile
php he/she can enable the windowing library for his/her platform.
i.e. --enable-windowing --with-windowing-[gtk|winbinder|*]
Just a thought. This would obviously require allot more thought and
collaboration between the PHP-GTK group but would be very nice. With this
setup there would also be more room to expand for other windowing toolkits
like KDE, Cocoa (Mac) etc.
-Justin Hannus
"Rubem Pechansky" <pechansky@hypervisual.com> wrote in message
news:20040917183524.71003.qmail@pb1.pair.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I have designed and successfully prototyped a native Windows binding for
> PHP. This binding is very lightweight and it is already capable of doing
> dialogs, controls, and a lot more with a few dozen lines of code. PHP can
> thus be used as a tool for quick development of native Windows
applications.
>
> I have just released this project to the public as Open Source at
> http://winbinder.sourceforge.net/. Although it is still a work
> in
progress,
> you can take a look at the source code, download a working demo and play
> with it a little bit.
>
> Your ideas, comments, criticisms and suggestions are very welcome.
>
> Several people advised me to submit it to PECL, and I think it's a good
idea
> too. However I wonder if it's not too early to submit it since it's still
> incomplete and buggy. Wouldn't it be better to submit it only after a more
> stable release? What do you think?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Rubem Pechansky