Re: Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-database.php

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Greg Beaver wrote: > Another *VERY* important reason this will be necessary is that the next > version of the installer includes some rather strict validation rules > for things like versioning, that will conflict with the way PECL works - > PECL versioning appears to have no relation whatsoever to PEAR > versioning, there are plenty of packages that are marked stable as > version 0.2.0, and there are releases like 0.1.00 floating around too. > If PECL has its own channel, it can use a much less strict validation > mechanism, and can even prevent pear packages from being packaged as php > releases (only extsrc/extbin would be allowed). But we should not have version numbers "0.1.00" or have "0.2.0" marked as "stable" it the first place. The versioning SHOULD resemble PEAR's (except for the perhaps package2 thing). Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org