Re: 回复: TDengine supported me and prom ised me a license for PHP extension
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Tue, 08 Mar 2022 10:03:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 回复: TDengine supported me and prom ised me a license for PHP extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-17468@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 08.03.2022 at 02:59, 张 振强 wrote:
> I changed the license to Apache according to your advice two month ago, but did not send an
> email to tell you.
>
> I thought it was all right, so I applied for an account, but no response..
>
> Wrong application content or it's not time to apply?
Your account has been opened just yesterday
(<https://pecl.php.net/user/bearlord>).
Sorry, that it took so long,
but apparently there are no more messages sent regarding account requests.
Christoph
> Thanks.
>
> 从 Windows
> 版邮件<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>发送
>
> 发件人: Christoph M. Becker<mailto:cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> 发送时间: 2022年1月17日 0:53
> 收件人: 张
> 振强<mailto:zhenqiang.zhang@hotmail.com>;
> pecl-dev@lists.php.net<mailto:pecl-dev@lists.php.net>
> 主题: Re: TDengine supported me and promised me a license for PHP extension
>
> On 16.01.2022 at 10:24, 张 振强 wrote:
>
>> Hello Christoph,
>>
>> I replied the email and always return failed.
>> [Remote Server returned '550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam
>> -> 550 5.7.1 Looks like spam to me.']
>>
>> So I write a new mail.
>>
>> As mentioned, I need one explicit permission of TDengine,
>> https://news-web.php.net/php.pecl.dev/17462.
>>
>>
>> I have communicated with TDengine, TDengine agreed with my development of extension and
>> expressed explicit support, and promised to give me a license to allow me to use of library files to
>> develop TDengine's PHP extensions. Is there a template for the license, or no fixed format?
>
> Great news! :) There is no license template. If TDengine would allow
> you to use the PHP License 3.01, that would be great, but a BSD or
> Apache type license would be fine as well.
>
> Christoph
>