Re: The requested document /package/domxml was not found on this server.

Thanks for mentioning that Rob, I've updated the package page (http://pecl.php.net/domxml). My gut feeling is to leave things as they are, without a PECL package, so that we don't wind up with a lot of people reporting the same "problems". If they want to run domxml with PHP 5, they'll need to get their hands dirty. How does that sound? --Wez. On 6/9/05, Rob Richards <rrichards@ctindustries.net> wrote: > There are a few things about this. > First, if dom is also loaded, things get screwed up fast - same class > names, etc.. > It used to work before namespaces were dropped. > There are a lot of fixes that need to be merged into PECL. Cant just > move over files as PECL does have some new functionality > As Chritian mentioned, I wont be supporting it under php 5. If the bug > is reproduceable under php 4 thats one thing, but not going to try to > fix something that is only a bug under php 5. Too many issues with > domxml hence the re-write. > > I dont mind synching it up with the php 4 code having a package created > for it and applying fixes that also apply to 4, but straight 5 support > is not going to happen. > > Rob > > Christian Stocker wrote: > > >On 9.6.2005 4:02 Uhr, Wez Furlong wrote: > > > > > >>That's because there is no pre-packaged domxml extension up there yet. > >>I've created a placeholder page and listed Christian as the lead > >>developer (since he put a lot of work into it). > >> > >> > > > >No problem, and I can try to package it up, but there is one main problem: > > > >domxml comes with the php4 source distribution, while it was replaced in > >php5 by dom. Therefore a lot of people are looking in PECL for domxml > >for php5. While some people claim they are using domxml on php5, I never > >really tested it and highly discourage from doing that as their is no > >support for it whatsover from my side (or rob, as far as i can tell) > > > >So, what's the point in packaging it, when it comes with php4 sources > >and is not supposed to be used in php5? Maybe making the docs more clear > >about that would be a better better approach. > > > >chregu > > > > > > > > > > > >>It would be great if someone has the time to package up domxml and > >>publish it to pecl.php.net. > >> > >>--Wez. > >> > >>Cc'd: Christian as a courtesy, not as hint that I'd like him to do it, > >>but just to let him know that I've put his name up there ;-) > >> > >> > >