Re: New Package Questions
| From: | Gordon Heydon | Date: | Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:20:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New Package Questions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-2737@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Bugger... I grabbed the wrong message to get the get the address from.
Sorry. Please disreguard
Gordon.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:24 -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
> I think you want the pear developers list, not the pecl developers list.
>
> --Wez.
>
> On 8/9/05, Gordon Heydon <gordon@heydon.com.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am a new PEAR developer and I am about to start the process of
> > contributing a class that allows PHP to communicate with IBM's U2
> > product RedBack which allows web integration with their PICK clones
> > UniData and UniVerse. (see
> > http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/) for
> > more information.
> >
> > Over the last couple of weeks I have been converting my code to the PEAR
> > coding standards and starting to document the API for other people to
> > use. Maybe one my biggest issues is the naming of my class and the
> > section that it should be included in.
> >
> > The working title for my class is redback, but because RedBack in a
> > registered Trademark owned by IBM I am fairly certain that I cannot use
> > it. As the other RedBack gateways for ASP and JSP are redpages and
> > redbeans respectively. I was thinking something along the same lines
> > like redbird (from the covers of the O'Reilly PHP pocket book) or
> > something like that. Another option would be to call it New_RedBack, but
> > I am not sure if this would be against the trademark.
> >
> > The section that I think it should go into is Networking, but I just
> > want to make sure before I create the draft proposal as I am not sure if
> > I can change the name or sections.
> >
> > I was also looking are some of the current draft proposals, some of
> > theme have been in the process for quite a while, is this normal? Can
> > you take a while to complete the draft proposal before it is moved into
> > Proposed?
> >
> > I also noticed that some did not have any links to code. Is the Draft
> > period used to bring together all the required documentation and code
> > together before the proposal is moved into the Proposed Status.
> >
> > Also I would like to hear any tips from people who have successfully
> > gotten a niche package into PEAR as I do feel that my biggest hurdle
> > will be getting the votes to get it finally submitted.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any assistance that can be offered.
> > Gordon.
> >
> > --
> > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
> !DSPAM:42f8f8d4170771146216450!
>