Re: Proposed Extension: Flite (a small, fast run timesynthesis engine)

From: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:17:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposed Extension: Flite (a small, fast run timesynthesis engine)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-3446@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Jeremy, be pre-warned, we have those same coding standards in PHP-GTK source too! (Not to mention our much-debated CS for any PHP code we release under the PHP-GTK umbrella, which you'll also 'hate'). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antony Dovgal" <antony@zend.com> To: "Jeremy Johnstone" <phpdev@gmail.com> Cc: "l0t3k" <cshmoove@hotmail.com>; <pecl-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:13 PM Subject: Re: [PECL-DEV] Proposed Extension: Flite (a small, fast run timesynthesis engine)
On 24.01.2006 18:57, Jeremy Johnstone wrote:
On 1/24/06, Antony Dovgal <antony@zend.com> wrote:
And case (in)sensitivity has nothing to do with this - "method_name" and "methodname" are different methods.
While the readability difference between "method_name" and "methodName" is a never ending religious war which I am not gonna continue to propogate, it is pretty clear that "method_name" is more readable than "methodname". That was my only point.
Do we really need to repeat whole discussion from the very beginning? It was decided that we use studlyCaps and coding standard clearly says to use them. Please, play nice and follow the rules of this game. Thanks. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php __________ NOD32 1.1376 (20060123) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com


« previous php.pecl.dev (#3446) next »