Re: Re: status of dio
| From: | Pierre | Date: | Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:29:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: status of dio | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-4239@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
On 10/9/06, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> wrote:
# pierre.php@gmail.com / 2006-10-09 18:03:17 +0200: On 10/9/06, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> wrote:As I said, there was no commit from the maintainers in the last four years.# Sergio.Paternoster@h3g.it / 2006-10-09 17:26:59 +0200:I do not think anyone with karma will release it. Releasing a dead package is a bad idea. It says that a package is maintained and alive, it is not. If you need, you can always use the CVS version or bundle it.wrote:From: Pierre [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 17:19:50 +0000 neuhauser@sigpipe.cz (Roman Neuhauser)what's up with dio? I'd like to use it, is it going to be released anytime soon?Given that the maintainers has not commited anything since 4 years, you should not have too much hope. The only changes were done when the extension was still in PHP.dio is a would-be dependency of a unit testing library I've been writing[1]. If I'm going to have my program packaged for BSDs[2] and Linux distributions[3], the packaging and installation processes need to be hassle-free[4]. So, if dio *does* work, can someone with enough karma release it?Yes, I checked the package several times. Anyway, what we have at the moment is working good...The package seems to be very alive and well, judging from the official PHP manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.dio.php says nothing about dio being dead.
I don't think it should be a problem., please contact Alan Knowles (I CC him). --PierreOk, so what if I'm willing to maintain it?