Re: RFC: Versioning for core modules

Steph Fox wrote:

One of the "problems" I'd like to see listed is being able to identify the exact code base a customer reported a problem on. Knowing whether it was from PECL on not can be useful information.

Wouldn't the -core/-dev/PECL release distinction achieve this?

I meant that the goal should be explicitly written in the RFC so that readers can identify what the RFC tries to solve.

It's not either/or - more a case of 'how far can we take this'.

If one of the RFC's gets superceded, let's mark it that way.

The unresolved issue for me is about Core modules in PECL. Is there a list of these modules? Without it, my view is based on OCI8.

There are 49 on my working list from last week, attached. This includes PECL extensions shipped with PHP 4 as well as PHP 5. It might even include some from earlier, I hopefully erred on the side of caution.

Thanks. Chris -- Christopher Jones, Oracle Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/f8jad Follow me: http://friendfeed.com/ghrd