Re: license question

From: Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:54:00 +0000
Subject: Re: license question
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-5354@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 4/8/08, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am currently making in-house extension, against CeCILL-C[1] licensed library. > > Will it be possible to publish it using PECL? > > > > Wikipedia suggests, that CeCILL-C is LGPL-compatible > > > I'm not lawyer but it seems to be fine. CeCILL-B sounds more > appropriate to fit the PECL philosophy (even if we have more > restricted licenses already). Well, library is licensed as CeCILL-C and I can't do anything about that > By the way, are you talking about the library used by an extension or > the extension itself? If it is for the extension itself, I see little > benefit to introduce yet another license. I am talking about library. I am ok with any license for the extension -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/

« previous php.pecl.dev (#5354) next »