Re: license question
| From: | Alexey Zakhlestin | Date: | Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:54:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: license question | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-5354@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 4/8/08, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am currently making in-house extension, against CeCILL-C[1] licensed library.
> > Will it be possible to publish it using PECL?
> >
> > Wikipedia suggests, that CeCILL-C is LGPL-compatible
>
>
> I'm not lawyer but it seems to be fine. CeCILL-B sounds more
> appropriate to fit the PECL philosophy (even if we have more
> restricted licenses already).
Well, library is licensed as CeCILL-C and I can't do anything about that
> By the way, are you talking about the library used by an extension or
> the extension itself? If it is for the extension itself, I see little
> benefit to introduce yet another license.
I am talking about library. I am ok with any license for the extension
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/