Re: superglobals

From: Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:52:22 +0000
Subject: Re: superglobals
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-543@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Friday 09 April 2004 05:10, Wez Furlong wrote: > as I recall, superglobals are resolved at script compile time, so > a superglobal() function you can call from PHP won't be possible. That is probably good since being able to add superglobals with a function would probably be mis-used more times than not. > > You can add your own superglobals in your extension; however, since > this isn't really going to meet the needs of others, it probably > won't make sense to put it into PECL. (unless you have a really > cool useful idea ;-) So it sounds like it is possible. I have been reading the php source that I think deals with superglobals. I have two ways I would like to use superglobals. One way would be to provide application variables that are accessible from multiple sessions. But that is not what I think the coolest idea is. The other, more important way I would like to implement a superglobal is to implement "aspects" in the framework I am working on (http://sourceforge.net/ projects/cep). While the $_ASPECT super global will not have any value be default, it will be a place to store object references that could be considered "aspects" in AOP languages. These aspects would be things like Logging, DB, Authentication, Cacheing, etc. $_ASPECT['db'] = new DB::connect(); $_ASPECT['log'] = new Log::singleton(); $_ASPECT['auth'] = new Auth(); This provides a cleaner alternative to storing these global object references inside an array inside the $GLOBALS array. There may be a better way to implement aspects in PECL, but this is all I got so far. Thanks, Jackson > > --Wez. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Cummings" <robert@interjinn.com> > To: "Andrey Hristov" <php@hristov.com> > Cc: "Jackson Miller" <jackson@tekzen.net>; "PHP-PECL" > <pecl-dev@lists.php.net>; <marcus@skysaber.com> > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: [PECL-DEV] superglobals > > > On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 05:45, Andrey Hristov wrote: > > > Jackson Miller wrote: > > > > Please excuse me if this is not an appropriate forum for this > > question. > > > > > The short question is: > > > > Is it possibly to create a PECL extension for PHP that adds a new > > (empty) > > > > > superglobal variable? If so, then I am assuming it would be possible > > to > > > > > create a PECL extension for adding a superglobal() method. > > > > > > > > I know this question has been discussed on php-dev a few times, but > > those > > > > > discussions have resulted in no solution (and I was not part of those > > > > discussions). > > > > > > AFAIR it was decided that adding such a function is a bad idea. > > > > PECL is about special needs though, is it not? I don't see why an > > outcome decided by internals should affect something in PECL. Is it > > possible anyways to added a new super globals entry via an extension?

« previous php.pecl.dev (#543) next »