Re: Account Request
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:51:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Account Request | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-5763@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Alexander Kahl <akahl@iconmobile.com> wrote:
> I'd like to submit my first PHP extension to pecl, php-(pecl)-yaml. The
> project is adapted from php_yaml originally written by rsky (Ryusuke
> Sekiyama) who doesn't reply to any patch submissions so I've decided to
> take over and add all missing basic parts.
> The extension acts as a binding between LibYAML[1] and PHP enabling the
> user to process YAML serialized data from and to native PHP data types,
> basically just like you can do with syck/php-pecl-syck but LibYAML
> supports YAML version 1.1.
> Although LibYAML is declared alpha I couldn't find any flaws so far, not
> even in productive usage.
>
> There is one caveat on this submission however:
> You're encouraging people to use the PHP License for their extensions. I
> feel deeply repelled by non-copyleft ("viral") licenses and cannot
> square publishing non-copyleft code with my conscience. If you don't
> mind I'd like to use the LGPLv3+ for this submission.
I would rather go with another license. As lgplv2 is fine (not desired
but fine), I really have doubts about the v3. If you like a very
liberal license, use the BSD one. But I still one question, what's the
problem with the PHP License 3.01?
Cheers,
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org