Re: official dead pecl extensions
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:15:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: official dead pecl extensions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Christopher Jones
<christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote:
> Do you have a hierarchy of obsolescence plan, e.g
>
> - After 1 year / 1 major release add "unmaintained" to the existing doc
> - After 2 years etc move the doc pages to an appendix of obsolete
> extensions
> - After 3 years move the doc to the package's pecl page
Time based classification makes no sense. One recent example to
illustrate why is inclued.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org