Re: Re: shared memory extention

hi, On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Olivier Hill <ohill@php.net> wrote: >> I think Pierre means the extension itself, and not the library it links >> against. Though I could be wrong, I'm far from being a licencing expert ;) > > Hope so, his statement was not too clear ;) > > I do agree that the extension itself cannot be LGPL, but libraries > used for linking can be. My statement was rether clear :): > For new extensions we only accept BSD-like licenses (new BSD, MIT for ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > example), Apache or PHP License. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org